Back
Back
industry
Back
Back
For many banks, regulatory change isn’t the blind spot, it’s the bottleneck. Most banks have no shortage of alerts and tracking tools alerting them to what’s happening across federal and state agencies. The real challenge is determining what applies to their specific products and services, and translating that knowledge into concrete, auditable action.
This is where compliance efforts often stall. Seeing change is one thing, but understanding how it impacts your lending portfolios, digital payment services, or multi-state obligations is another. And doing something about it—efficiently, consistently, and at scale—is where the future is being built.
What’s missing in many cases is the ability to connect those alerts to real obligations, filtered by what actually applies to the bank’s operations.
In 2025, we’re seeing a new compliance technology stack start to take shape. It’s designed not just to monitor the regulatory environment, but to operationalize it. At the core of this emerging model are AI agents—autonomous systems that assist with interpreting rules, proposing updates, and coordinating change across internal functions.
The stack can be thought of in three layers: discovery, action, and oversight. The first layer—discovery—is where most banks have invested heavily over the last decade. Regulatory alerts come in from every direction: federal rulemakings, state-level amendments, guidance documents, and enforcement actions. The systems for monitoring have grown more sophisticated, so today’s challenge is relevance. Without targeted filtering based on jurisdiction, business line, and risk category, even the best alerts can turn into noise. And without structured tagging and classification, downstream systems have nothing useful to work with.
What’s missing in many cases is the ability to connect those alerts to real obligations, filtered by what actually applies to the bank’s operations. For example, a rule impacting mortgage disclosures in three states may have no bearing on a bank’s business lending arm but might require immediate attention for its retail products team. Sifting through those connections manually takes time, introduces risk, and leads to inconsistent responses between departments.
That’s where the second layer comes in—and where AI agents are beginning to prove their value.
Rather than handing an alert to legal for interpretation, to compliance for triage, and to First Line for mapping, the AI agent initiates a first pass.
AI agents are a new generation of intelligent systems designed not just to process data, but to carry out tasks based on that data. In the compliance context, they act like digital analysts: once a regulatory alert is ingested, the agent interprets the change, identifies what parts of the business it affects, and proposes specific updates—whether it’s to a policy, a control, or an internal workflow. Think of them as task-oriented assistants that work continuously in the background, narrowing the gap between legal interpretation and organizational response.
For example, once an alert enters Regology’s system, an AI agent helps determine what it means in practical terms. The agent draws from a central knowledge base—your Smart Law Library—to interpret legal language, identify affected controls or business functions, and propose specific updates to policies or procedures.
This is not about replacing human compliance expertise. It’s about reducing the friction between discovery and execution. Rather than handing an alert to legal for interpretation, to compliance for triage, and to First Line for mapping, the agent initiates a first pass. It surfaces what’s likely relevant, flags potential impacts, and packages it in a way that teams can act on quickly, with traceability built in.
Take a hypothetical scenario: A bank operating in 18 states receives updated privacy requirements affecting online account onboarding. The AI agent not only identifies the regulatory change but also recognizes that the institution’s digital onboarding process involves data collection workflows that intersect with the new requirements. It proposes a control update and routes it to the appropriate owners. Compliance professionals still review and validate the recommendation, but they have a head start, not starting from scratch.
This kind of automation isn’t just about speed. It’s about scale. The number of regulatory updates isn’t decreasing. The pressure to demonstrate defensible processes to regulators is growing. And teams, in many cases, are staying the same size or shrinking.
Compliance professionals still review and validate the recommendation, but they have a head start, not starting from scratch.
The third layer of the stack is human oversight. AI agents aren’t decision makers; they’re decision-support systems. Final accountability rests with people—compliance officers, legal counsel, and control owners. What the technology does is streamline how information gets to them, make it actionable, and document the process along the way. Every step—every recommendation, review, and revision—is logged. That’s critical not only for audit readiness but for internal governance and accountability.
As banks explore how to modernize their compliance operations in 2025, this kind of intelligent automation is moving from a theoretical concept to a practical necessity. The compliance technology stack is evolving—from a set of disconnected tools into a more unified, responsive system.
The organizations that lead in this space will be those that build infrastructure with both agility and accountability in mind. That means moving beyond reactive alerting and manual mapping, and toward systems that connect change to action, with AI agents doing the heavy lifting under the hood.
It also means recognizing that this transition isn’t just technical, it’s strategic. Building AI-assisted compliance systems requires foundational decisions about regulatory taxonomies, control frameworks, data models, and workflow design. But the payoff is significant: less time spent on repetitive tasks, fewer handoffs, faster implementation of changes, and stronger audit defensibility.
In a year where compliance risks are expanding—particularly around fintech innovation, evolving consumer protections, and cross-border obligations—banks don’t just need better alerting. They need systems that help them act. And AI agents are quickly becoming the connective tissue between knowledge and execution.
In 2025, the difference between keeping pace and falling behind will come down to how well banks can operationalize change, not just track it. The banks that succeed won’t just see more clearly. They’ll move faster, with confidence, and with systems that scale as regulations do.
